« Interview: A major pirate in the movie underground | Main | Deep Blog »
Top 10 assaults on digital liberties
After interviewing experts in the intellectual property wars over the past three years, I've come up with this list of Top 10 infringements on U.S. citizens' digital liberties. (Those living abroad are seeing their digital freedoms eroded as well, thanks to WIPO agreements signed under U.S. pressure.) Feel free to make your own list, or comment below.
1. INDUCE Act
The proposed legislation in Congress, with bipartisan backing, was beaten back at the 11th hour, but some form of this legislation will undoubtedly be back. The INDUCE Act would effectively outlaw innovative new technologies, such as peer-to-peer networks and devices that could be construed as "inducing" a copyright violation. Think: iPod.
2. Broadcast flag
The Federal Communications Commission bowed to the entertainment industry's demands to make digital televisions less capable for viewers, but a federal court struck down the ruling in May 2005. Think the fight is over? It now moves to Congress.
3. DMCA
The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act prohibits citizens from circumventing locks on digital media even for legitimate purposes. The anti-circumvention provisions need to be repealed.
4. Copyright Extension Act
The 1998 Sonny Bono Act extended copyright terms -- already unreasonably long -- by another 20 years, preventing vast numbers of digital materials from the 1920s from entering the public domain and frustrating Internet publishers, scholars and users.
5. Fair use — going, going, gone?
The entertainment industries have launched a systematic attack on fair use, restricting the ways in which the public can access and use media — especially visual media — so that citizens can no longer make legal uses of materials that were readily accessible in the analog era.
6. Trusted computing
The jury is still out on this one, but if inter-industry efforts succeed in reengineering the personal computer according to Hollywood's wishes, computers will no longer be general computing devices but entertainment playback machines.
7. Hollywood's strategy of chilling innovation
The entertainment industry has effectively thwarted innovative startups from bringing disruptive new products and technologies to market because of fears of a major lawsuit.
8. Overly restrictive DRM
Onerous, anti-consumer uses of digital rights management have chipped away at the traditional ways in which the public can access and use media, paving the way for a pay-per-view universe.
9. Proposed audio broadcast flag
If the FCC is granted authority by Congress, it may adopt the RIAA's request to lock down copyrighted audio content, making it difficult to time-shift and transfer copyrighted audio shows between different devices.
10. Consortium collusion
Corporations that work on networking and the interoperability of devices frequently set standards that prevent citizens from doing what they want with content they legally own.
Honorable mention: The No Electronic Theft Act of 1997.
May 30, 2005 at 07:58 PM in Digital rights & copyright | Permalink
| Comments (3)
|
|
(2)
» Top Ten Assaults on Digital Liberties from diglet
Darknet: Top 10 assaults on digital liberties That's "liberties" not "libraries" -- but these assaults on digital liberties will affect digital libraries as well.... [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 1, 2005 3:10:49 PM
» 'Darknet' and the struggle for the soul of your machines from Smart Mobs
Howard Rheingold, who wrote the foreword to my new book from Wiley -- Darknet: Hollywood's War Against the Digital Generation -- kindly offered to let me guest-blog here the next couple of days. And as a great fan of both... [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 7, 2005 12:12:02 PM
Comments
I'd expand on your fair use point to include the death of people's ability to re-sell products such as music or books. DRM, of course, prevents consumers from doing that.
Posted by: Gary Marshall | May 31, 2005 12:41:56 AM
Ah yes, the nearly forgotten first sale doctrine! Thanks!
Posted by: JD | May 31, 2005 1:51:14 AM
I'm finding it harder to use basic software to LEGALLY download (that does exist). Example - the firefox browser (mac) required plugins, etc. before it would even show an option to 'download to disc'.
I've seen several reports showing independent artists and labels have experienced explosive growth recently - and more than make up for the losses RIAA has reported (christian science monitor was the source for one story; Wilco's experience supports that too).
I've never seen Independent music's growth mentioned in most articles written about copywrites.
I became alarmed reading about patents on basic biologicals. The result is that due to licensing fees for a process, instead of having 500 labs researching with a process, it's narrowed down to a handful who can afford it. I think the world will see the result of that idea with the avian flu problem. (sources; WHO website, Science mag)
It's the back door to limiting free speech and innovation to only a few.
Posted by: aikanae | Jun 21, 2005 1:02:28 PM


















